Is Third-Party SAP Software Support Right for Your Organization

Shawn du Plessis, VP- SAP Global Support Services, Spinnaker Support

Shawn du Plessis, VP- SAP Global Support Services, Spinnaker Support

CIOs traditionally inherit a significant annual support fee upon licensing enterprise software from SAP. This support is especially valuable when initially installing or subsequently upgrading the software. Over time, a value gap surfaces as the software matures. Common concerns relate to lack of support for modified applications, untimely bug fixes, unsatisfactory response times and skill levels, decreasing value, and increasing costs. Third-party support is a proven option that delivers customized services, improved service satisfaction, and lower costs. However, third-party software support is not for every organization. To help SAP software users decide if third-party support is a potential fit, this article provides tips from operational, legal, and financial perspectives.

At most enterprises, software is the first or second largest category of IT spending and consumes 25-40 percent of IT costs in most industries. Accenture recently found that maintenance/support consumes 50-60 percent of software spending, primarily delivered by the larger enterprise software publishers. With in 3-5 years, enterprises spend as much on support as on the original software purchase. While this is a necessary cost of business, Aberdeen and Gartner have found that many enterprise leaders are dissatisfied. Third-party software support typically increases satisfaction and cuts costs by at least 50 percent. Resultant savings enable IT leaders to do more for the business. Furthermore, this option buys time to evaluate longer-term software options from operational, legal, and financial angles.

Operational Considerations: Conventional vs. Third-Party

Self-Service Tools—Software publishers offer content and diagnostic tools that help enterprise customers to help them selves, where as third parties immediately focus on issue resolution.

Upgrades—Third parties do not deliver future publisher-built upgrades or new releases, so enterprise leaders need to consider if and when to acquire new releases.

Modifications—Third parties usually support issues with modified code. Publishers usually do not, requiring the enterprise to carry that cost or in some cases forego valuable modifications.

Expert First Call Response—Third parties usually dedicate a senior engineer as the primary contact from first call to final resolution. Publishers typically use customer care representatives for the first call.

Legal Considerations: Conventional vs. Third-Party

Third-party support providers need to operate in ways that protect the intellectual property rights of the software publisher. While enterprise software publishers have validated the choice to acquire support services from third parties, the processes followed by some third-party providers has led to litigation.

The legal landscape among third-party support providers may change over time. Nevertheless, enterprise buyers should look for providers that (1) protect the software publishers’ intellectual property and there by are not at risk of costly litigation (2) are not facing legal judgments that could subsequently interrupt or compromise service level.

Financial Differences: Conventional vs. Third-Party

Typical publisher annual costs are 18-22 percent of the original license purchase price. There may be additional charges for premium support, such as SAP’s Max Attention. These fees do not take into account in licenses that are not even in use (shelfware); so many organizations are paying for unused or unnecessary licenses. By contrast, third-party providers will typically tailor a pricing structure around what licenses you are using and the number and types of tickets you are logging on an annual basis. Research shows that organizations typically pay the equivalent of the original license purchase price in approximately three years.

Re-engagement with SAP, after a stint on third-party support, also merits consideration.

Relicensing or paying “back” support are standard re-engagement options. In many cases, relicensing ends up benefiting the end-user organization and paying “back” support is negotiable. Organizations use this circumstance to right size their license count and/or purchase a new version at an attractive price. In addition, the end-user will have still saved money while leveraging third-party support.

Is Third Party Support Right For Your Organization?

The best candidates for third-party support share these characteristics:

Stable–Enterprises that operate in more stable or mature environments and have upgrade cycles greater than 36 months can save by skipping new releases or foregoing continual upgrades.

Highly Modified–Enterprises that are operating a highly modified software version can retain full support.

Planned Replacement–Enterprises that are migrating to another application (cloud or on premise) can cut costs leading up to parallel operations and eventual legacy system shutdown.

Duress–Enterprises that are undergoing financial challenge can respond by cutting near term support expenses.

Nevertheless, third party is not for everyone. Enterprises that should continue to acquire support services from SAP have these characteristics:

Initial Deployment of a Major Release–Enterprises that have just purchased or need to acquire a major release typically need access to the SAP’s corrective patches and deployment-related support interactions.

Highly Dynamic Technology Environment–Some enterprises maintain a frequent system upgrade cycle, such as every 18-36 months for a significant refresh. There fore, having continual access to new releases and patches will be less expensive than switching from and then re-engaging with the publisher.

How To Choose A Third-Party Support Provider

Select–Identify a third-party partner that can satisfy the business requirements for all needed software support services: software support, managed services, and IT advisement capabilities.

Predict–Identify the expected savings. Verify the financial case for switching from SAP support. Ascertain the rules of re-engagement in case you might wish to acquire a future release.

Validate–Confirm that the preferred third party service provider’s delivery practices, processes, and methods do not violate your software publisher’s intellectual property rights.

Third-party support can be a powerful strategy to upgrade service level, lower or redirect IT spend, supplement your IT staff, or to re establish control of your enterprise software roadmap.

Read Also

In 2022 and beyond, IT is all about the data

In 2022 and beyond, IT is all about the data

Jeff Tapley, Group MD – EMEA, Interxion: A Digital Realty Company
My Experience as a Med-tech Entrepreneur

My Experience as a Med-tech Entrepreneur

Justin Waghray, Founding Partner, ÆVUS Venture Partners
Can Your Medical Device Learn While Working?

Can Your Medical Device Learn While Working?

Celestina Bianco, Director of Quality and Regulatory Affairs, Clinical Software, Werfen
Mastering The Challenges of Tomorrow's Healthcare Market

Mastering The Challenges of Tomorrow's Healthcare Market

Stefan Sevens, Vice President Medical Solutions, Datwyler Sealing Solutions
Point-of-Care Testing for Infectious Diseases - Now and in the Near Future

Point-of-Care Testing for Infectious Diseases - Now and in the Near Future

Gorm Lisby, Section Chief, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Amager og Hvidovre Hospital
The 3 'I's for innovation in Digital Health

The 3 'I's for innovation in Digital Health

Dr Antoni Chan, MBChB, PhD, FRCP Consultant Rheumatologist and Physician, Associate Medical Director, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
follow on linkedin follow on twitter

Copyright © 2021 CIOReviewEurope. All rights reserved.         Contact         |         Subscribe